1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. Programming

  • Re: Math and programming

    From Shitty@VERT/ALCO to Matthew Munson on Thursday, July 17, 2025 23:10:00
    should i try and self teach myself some mathematics so i could
    understand programming or can one program without the need for Calculus?

    There's no need for advanced math skills unless you're writing software that solves advanced math problems.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/02/26 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: alcoholidaybbs.com / Est. 1995 / Columbia, SC
  • From poindexter FORTRAN@VERT/REALITY to Shitty on Friday, July 18, 2025 08:42:50
    Shitty wrote to Matthew Munson <=-

    should i try and self teach myself some mathematics so i could
    understand programming or can one program without the need for Calculus?

    There's no need for advanced math skills unless you're writing software that solves advanced math problems.

    And, in that case, you pulled your copy of "Numerical Recipes in
    FORTRAN" off the shelf and cribbed the algorithm from the book. Or C,
    if that was your flavor.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.
  • From dmux@VERT/ABINARY to poindexter FORTRAN on Monday, September 22, 2025 12:47:00
    Numerical Recipes in C

    Hah, I have a hardcover copy of this book in my cubicle. I found it at the thrift store. I find the code rather incomprehensible though.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Archaic Binary * bbs.archaicbinary.net
  • From poindexter FORTRAN@VERT/REALITY to dmux on Saturday, October 11, 2025 16:05:53
    Re: Re: Math and programming
    By: dmux to poindexter FORTRAN on Mon Sep 22 2025 12:47 pm

    Hah, I have a hardcover copy of this book in my cubicle. I found it at the thrift store. I find the code rather incomprehensible though.

    The FORTRAN version I started out with was great, the code was quite readable. I don't know if it was FORTRAN 66 or FORTRAN 77, but back then the looping was pretty simple. They might have had a GOSUB command back then, not sure now.

    I wish I'd saved my code from school - lots of ANSI C compiled on PC, VAX assembly language and FORTRAN on a variety of big iron. Even some Modula-2 and LISP!

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.
  • From Dr. What@VERT/CABANABR to poindexter FORTRAN on Sunday, October 12, 2025 10:29:00
    The FORTRAN version I started out with was great, the code was quite readable. I don't know if it was FORTRAN 66 or FORTRAN 77, but back then the looping was pretty simple. They might have had a GOSUB command back then, not sure now.

    That's what a SUBROUTINE was for under FORTRAN. No GOSUB needed.

    But FORTRAN did have some interesting IF and GOTO constructs.

    ex: IF (variable) label-1,label-0,label+1
    or 2 types of computed GOTOs. One similar to BASIC's ON GOTO. But the other you could set a variable to a label and goto the variable.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: bbs.CabanaBar.net:11123